Contact Us

O

observer.ug

@observer Tue, 02 Jan 2024 00:18:35

Museveni unveils 4-point plan for 2024

As 2023 came to a close, President Museveni took the opportunity in his End-of-Year speech from Rwakitura to reflect on Uganda’s progress and outline key priorities for the year ahead, 2024.

One of the central themes of President Museveni’s address was the importance of wealth creation within households. He reiterated that there are four main sectors crucial for both wealth and job creation in Uganda. The president stressed the significance of commercial agriculture, distinguishing between intensive and extensive farming practices.

He emphasized the need for high-value activities even on a small scale. Notably, he highlighted seven key enterprises: coffee, fruits (mangoes, oranges, pineapples, apples, grapes), zero-grazing dairy farming, fish farming, poultry for egg production, piggery, and homestead food crops such as cassava and bananas.

President Museveni cited success stories of individuals and communities who have implemented these practices and are now thriving. President Museveni pointed out that both intensive and extensive agriculture were essential for Uganda’s prosperity. Extensive agriculture, focusing on crops like maize and soybeans, is critical to support intensive agriculture.

He argued that large-scale cultivation of low-value crops could be highly profitable. For instance, one acre of maize can yield up to Shs 4 million in a year, and scaling up to 100 or even 1,000 acres can lead to substantial earnings. The president also highlighted the significant growth in various sectors of the Ugandan economy.

Coffee production had surged to nine million bags, up from two million bags in 1986. Milk production reached an impressive 5.2 billion liters, compared to two million liters in 1986. The cattle population also increased from three million in 1986 to a remarkable 16 million.

Furthermore, tea production had risen to 60 million kilograms from just three million kilograms in 1986. President Museveni discussed the expansion of the industrial sector, which now boasted 8,617 factories employing 829,668 people. He acknowledged the challenges posed by corruption and bribery, which sometimes hindered entrepreneurs from obtaining necessary licenses or land for their factories.

He emphasized the government’s commitment to lowering production costs, including electricity, water, transportation, and access to affordable credit, to ensure Uganda’s products remained competitive both domestically and in export markets.

The president reiterated the government’s long-standing goal of shifting people from agriculture to industry and services. He argued that agriculture, which engaged a significant portion of the population, was characterised by low productivity. President Museveni cited the example of tractors capable of plowing 1,200 acres in a single season.

With 40 million arable acres in Uganda, the potential for increased efficiency and job creation through mechanized farming was immense. President Museveni discussed efforts to empower the youth with valuable skills. He had established 18 skilling hubs across the country, offering training in various fields such as carpentry, metalwork, shoemaking, and motor mechanics.

Plans were in place to expand these hubs to include textile technology, ceramics, and ICT, in addition to the existing technical colleges. The president also mentioned the availability of financial support, such as the Emyooga funds, to assist skilled youth after their training.

The services sector, which included transport, hotels, tourism, and professional services like law, medicine, engineering, preaching, and music, had experienced substantial growth. It currently employed 4.14 million people. President Museveni acknowledged the need to address certain aspects of the sector, such as assisting musicians in recording and protecting their intellectual property through copyright laws.

The president touched on the rapid expansion of the Information and communications technology (ICT) sector, which was now employing 2.3 million people in both direct and indirect roles. He highlighted the potential for growth through Business Process Outsourcing (BPO), where Ugandans could provide services to companies abroad, such as bookkeeping for American or Canadian firms. President Museveni cited India, where the BPO sector employed 10 million people and generated $51 billion in revenue.

Turning to the issue of corruption, President Museveni acknowledged that it was primarily a problem among those with access to power and public funds. However, he assured the public that measures were in place to combat corruption, emphasizing that the corrupt were in the minority.

The president urged vigilance and encouraged citizens to report corrupt practices. President Museveni emphasized the importance of regional integration for prosperity. He recounted a recent decision to reject the idea of banning Tanzanian rice.

{loadposition inarticle}

read more
O

observer.ug

@observer Wed, 03 Jan 2024 00:17:12

How intervention of Rwanda halted militants in Mozambique

In 2017, a terror group known as Ansar al-Sunna or Al-Shabaab had taken a foothold in the oil-rich northern region of Mozambique, having met no resistance from the country’s forces.

However, following the intervention of Rwandan forces, JOEL MUKISA writes that normalcy has been restored, albeit with some civilian casualties.

For years, African countries have turned into a ferment of international terrorism, casting countries into the global limelight as security agencies across the unstable continent seem to be at sixes and sevens on how to foil the attacks.

A case in point was in Southern Africa, where ISIS partnered with an Islamist group called al-Shabaab (no link to al-Shabaab in Somalia) and took a foothold in Mozambique, where it staged attacks in the northern Cabo Delgado province, chasing away the presence of the central government as well as the local population.

The violence, including the raiding of villages and towns, had killed more than 3,306 people and displaced at least 800,000 from their homes over the years, but the assault was halted when Rwanda sent about 1,000 soldiers. Rwandan troops, according to the agreement the East African nation signed, took responsibility for three districts: Palma, Mocimboa da Praia, and Ancuabe.

The contingent, the Rwandan Security Forces say, is divided into two components— military and police—with a Level II field hospital. On August 8, 2021, Rwandan security forces said that, jointly with Mozambican forces, they had captured the port city of Mocimboa da Praia.

“The joint forces captured several major towns, trading centres, and villages, including the strongholds of Mbau and Awasse, along with other key areas such as Naquitengue, Chinda, Diaca, Quelimane, Pundanhar, and Nhica do Rovuma in Palma, Mueda, and Mocimboa Da Praia city,” Rwandan forces said.

Though instant success was registered by the time Rwanda intervened, the Southern African Development Community (SADC), the regional bloc to which Mozambique belongs, had filibustered on its pledges to contribute troops. South Africa, the most powerful country in the bloc, said it couldn’t fulfil its commitment because of what it termed “organizational and logistical” reasons.

The operations to eliminate terror groups in Mozambique are under the auspices of the United Nations, or UN, and the African Union (AU), which prompted many to question whether civilians would be protected during this period.

Formerly, traditional peacekeeping missions had an unacceptable record of protecting innocent onlookers. The UN and AU were criticised for failing to protect citizens in South Sudan, DR Congo, and the Central African Republic as atrocities were carried out under the watch of the peacekeepers.

As an offensive counterterrorism operation, the mission is also hypothetically more aggressive and violent than peacekeeping, but findings have shown that Rwanda hasn’t used a heavy hand in putting down the rebellion. The Rwandan army, according to Ralph Shield, who has done extensive research on Rwanda’s operations in Mozambique, inflicted its first recorded civilian, a single curfew breaker, in a tensely recovered town.

“Rwandan military behaviour in Mozambique operationalizes Kigali’s rhetorical commitment to aggressively defend endangered civilians.
“The counterinsurgency doctrine applied in Cabo Delgado balances insurgent pursuit and civilian protection through a combination of contact patrolling and tactical restraint,” Shield says, adding that this formula demonstrates learning from the country’s previous experience with domestic rebellion and international peacekeeping.

An RDF soldier vaccinates a child in the liberated zones

One of the tactics Rwandan troops have used to ensure that Mozambique citizens are won over is actively patrolling and interacting with the community to collect information about the local people and the insurgents who threaten them.

“Rwandan soldiers benefit from their knowledge of Swahili, which enables them to communicate directly with the locals. It helps them tell friend from foe,” Shield says, adding that the second factor is restraint: a more disciplined use of firepower, but he hastily adds that the experience of Western armies in Iraq and Afghanistan has shown that maintaining restraint under the persistent threat of ambush isn’t easy.

The fact that Cabo Delgado is the location of a liquefied natural gas project run by French energy giant Total has only triggered questions about what exactly Rwanda’s intentions are, but now there are also questions about when these troops will pull out.

This is not an easy question when you factor in the fact that Mozambique had failed to overwhelm the jihadists in the years before the foreign troops arrived.

“The Islamist insurgency in Mozambique, however, has yet to be defeated. A long-term solution will require more fundamental political and social measures, as well as reform of Mozambique’s security services,” Shields says, adding that Rwandan army operations have demonstrated what a competent African force can do when properly resourced and committed to the mission.

Rwanda Defence Forces publicist Brig Ronald Rwivanga recently said that the foreign forces had fulfilled their combat and security missions, and now they are making arrangements for internally displaced people to return to their homes.

“In the Palma and Mocimbona da Praia districts, the returnees are about 80 per cent, and the number keeps increasing as more people begin rebuilding,” Brig Rwivanga was quoted by the East African in December 2023.

{loadposition inarticle}

read more
O

observer.ug

@observer Wed, 03 Jan 2024 00:37:14

Anti-homosexuality law leaves Uganda isolated but defiant

Six months on since the anti-homosexuality law came into effect, the consequences of this law have had a significant impact on Uganda’s economy, access to healthcare, jurisprudence, NGO operations as well as the very members of parliament that passed it.

As GEOFREY SERUGO writes, several leading figures in the country remain defiant in spite of the growing alienation of Uganda by the West.

ALIENATION

On the wake of the passing of the law, the USA, several European countries as well as global institutions slammed the law and continue to campaign to highlight Uganda’s ‘increasingly deplorable human rights record.’

Several economists such as Julius Mukunda, the executive director of the Civil Society Budget Advocacy Group (CSBAG), also warned that it will affect the financing of Uganda’s budget, as approximately half of the national budget relies on debt financing.

“This law is going to have dire effects on the economy. Half of the national budget is financed through debt. Most of these concessional loans are from the European Union (EU) and the US. This law puts us on the spot whether we have a plan B to finance our national development plan agenda.”

Indeed, the World Bank Group was the first to act in August, 2023 when it halted new loans to Uganda. The USA-based lender paused all project financing to Uganda on grounds that the law discriminates sexual and gender minorities in its projects.

“Uganda’s Anti-Homosexuality Act fundamentally contradicts the World Bank Group’s values,” the lender said in a statement.
“We believe our vision to eradicate poverty on a livable planet can only succeed if it includes everyone irrespective of race, gender, or sexuality. This law undermines those efforts. Inclusion and non- discrimination sit at the heart of our work around the world.”

KCCA, which receives an average of Shs 100 billion per year from the World Bank, is already one of the affected entities.

PARLIAMENT DEFIANT

Just a week after the law came into effect, the USA and UK showed their might by revoking the visa of the speaker of parliament, Anita Among, through an email.

“The US government has revoked your current visa on information that came available after your last issuance. As of May 12, 2023, you don’t possess a valid visa to the US although you are welcome to apply again. You are encouraged to forward your passport to the US Embassy through the ministry of Foreign Affairs for necessary modifications to your visa,” read the email.

Then on December 4, the USA widened the net to include all the 348 MPs that voted to pass the bill in parliament. Antony Blinken, the US secretary of state, in a statement, said: “Today, I am announcing the expansion of the visa restriction policy to include current or former Ugandan officials or others who are believed to be responsible for, or complicit in, undermining the democratic process in Uganda or for policies or actions aimed at repressing members of marginalised or vulnerable populations. The groups include, but are not limited to, environmental activists, human rights defenders, journalists, LGBTQI+ persons, and civil society organisers. The immediate family members of such persons may also be subject to these restrictions.”

After that development by the USA, Asuman Basalirwa, the person behind the Anti-Homosexuality Act, stated that no sanction would weaken Uganda’s sovereignty while acknowledging that there has been pressure from the West on MPs. He also underlined the significance of uniting to defend African values and culture.

Meanwhile, Among did not waver, declaring that parliament does not regret enacting the legislation. “I don’t fear being barred from travelling overseas,” she declared.

The defiance is indicative of a larger national mood to protect cultural identity. The USA usually keeps the list of prohibited officials a secret until after they submit an application for a visa. But now that members of their close family were added, it reflects the deep concern of how the law is biting LGBTQI+ persons and NGOs.

NGOs CHOKING

Indeed, the law is having an adverse effect on the operations of some human rights NGOs. The law, which includes provisions for reporting and penalties related to promoting homosexuality, has created an atmosphere of fear and insecurity for organizations working with LGBTQ individuals.

According to an official from the NGO Bureau who preferred anonymity, about 30 NGOs have been inspected, with some receiving warnings regarding their association with LGBTQ people. For instance, six months on since the law came into effect, operations of the Uganda Harm Reduction Network (UHRN) have been hampered.

Before the enactment of the law, UHRN was a bustling hub supporting people who use and inject drugs, especially the youth. However, a recent visit found the place deserted, highlighting the impact of the new law.

Twaibu Wamala, the UHRN executive director, expressed concerns about constant surveillance and harassment against LGBTQ individuals using drugs since the law’s implementation.

“The law was intended to stigmatize and discredit NGOs that work for human rights and other important causes. It has eliminated important funding sources and is giving the ideal justification for fining and closing important organizations,” he said.

The law requires individuals and organizations to report those engaged in same-sex acts or supporting homosexuality, with severe penalties for entities found guilty of promoting homosexuality. The fear of exposure and legal consequences has created a climate of fear and mistrust, hindering LGBTQ individuals from seeking essential services, including counseling and psychosocial support.

Despite a directive from the ministry of Health to public hospitals to provide services without discrimination, the law contradicts Uganda’s obligations under various international human rights instruments. UHRN, along with local and international partners, has consistently reminded the government of these contradictions.

The law imposes exorbitant fines, up to Shs 1bn, for entities promoting homosexuality, contributing to a coercive and punitive environment. This has led to self-censorship and secrecy within the NGO world, making it challenging for LGBTQ individuals who use drugs to express their identities openly.

LEGAL CHALLENGE

Even before the law was passed, several human rights activists and lawyers had already warned they would challenge it. They petitioned the Constitutional court shortly after it was passed, calling for it to be overturned on grounds that it discriminates sexual minorities on top of trampling on several fundamental human rights.

The petitioners include MP Fox Odoi and Paul Bucyana Kiwizera, activists Frank Mugisha, Pepe Onziema, Jackline Kemigisa, Linda Mutesi, Kintu Nyago, Jane Nasiimbwa and Andrew Mwenda. Early this month, the Constitutional court began hearing the petition but due to the constant commotion in court, it was agreed by all sides to proceed with written submissions as opposed to oral submissions.

Last week, a panel of five judges led by deputy chief justice Richard Buteera received written submissions from both parties and informed them they would be notified when a ruling is ready. Amidst all this back-and-forth challenges, it remains to be seen how the fallout from the anti-homosexuality law will be settled.

{loadposition inarticle}

read more
O

observer.ug

@observer Wed, 03 Jan 2024 01:07:27

People we love to see spearhead realization of the Ugandan dream

Despite the gloomy experiences of 2023, several Ugandans did remarkable things in the country to improve the quality of life.

The Observer compiled a list of individuals and institutions whose works positively impact society through inspiration, skilling, business, sports, activism, or even research, innovations and, most especially, causing accountability. In no order, the individuals are recognised for creating a profound influence to inspire other Ugandans.

JIMMY SPIRE SSENTONGO

He wears several hats right from university don, satirist, cartoonist and social commentator. But the one thing that endears him most to the public is his newfound activism.

In recent years, social media followers have severally hailed him as Uganda’s de facto inspector general of police as well as inspector general of government. Ssentongo has become the go-to person for public queries and has led a series of exhibitions that took place on Twitter between April and June 2023.

Notably, during the pothole exhibition, President Museveni unexpectedly allocated Shs 6 billion for road repairs in Kampala. While social media activism is recognized as a potent tool for raising awareness, these exhibitions spotlighted the capacity of social media to spur tangible real-world change.

PROF SUSAN KIGULI

During the recently concluded Civil Poetry Festival held in Vercelli, Italy, Ugandan poet, writer and academic, Professor Susan Kiguli was honoured with a prestigious Lifetime Achievement Award in recognition of her notable contribution to the world of poetry.

Prof Susan Kiguli

Kiguli became the first African to receive the prestigious honour which places her in the same league with other literary luminaries such as Jesper Svenbro and Adam Zagajewski, among others.

DR MOSES OCHOLA & IZATH NURA

Two Ugandan scientists, Dr Moses Ochola and Izath Nura (R) received the Africa Young Innovators for Health Award for their immense contribution towards universal health coverage.

The award supports young health entrepreneurs across Africa with the tools they need to advance promising healthcare solutions for the betterment of their communities.

JOSHUA CHEPTEGEI

In the world of athletics, Cheptegei’s performance was a mixed bag last year. Although he showed his dominance by winning his third consecutive World Championship 10,000 metres gold, his debut in the Valencia Marathon was not as impressive as expected. Unfortunately, he finished in 37th place, leaving much to be desired.

GLADYS ATTO

Ophthalmologist Gladys Atto, working at Moroto regional referral Hospital, emerged as the Doctor of the Year at the 2023 Heroes in Health awards.

Dr Gladys Atto emerged as Doctor of the Year 2023

She was awarded for her exceptional and selfless services, most especially in restoring the sight of her patients. Heroes in Health awards recognize outstanding individuals, entities, organisations, services, products, and programs.

JUSTICE STEPHEN MUBIRU

The no-nonsense head of High court’s Commercial court laid a marker on the independence of the judiciary in which he criticized the principal judge’s interference with a decision of a High court registrar.

In his bold ruling, he said that it was improper for the deputy registrar of the court to issue a garnishee order nisi and then recall it on the same day basing on the orders of the principal judge.

DR ARTHUR KWIZERA

He mobilized resources from his friends to construct and equip a new intensive care unit (ICU) at Kisoro hospital becoming the first district hospital in Uganda with an ICU facility.

The facility will enhance the necessary acute care services and training for acute care practitioners in the Kigezi sub-region.

NNAABAGEREKA SYLVIA NAGGINDA LUSWATA

Through the launch of her book, the Nnaabagereka was able to tell the story of one of the most significant kingdoms in modern history.

The successful publication of the age-old history of B(U)ganda and her Queen who has redefined the position of Nnaabagereka was a momentous event to write home about.

JOE GAYI

Uganda’s Joe Gayi emerged as the top winner in Absa’s L’Atelier 2023 awards. The awards aim to assist young artists on their journey of self-discovery and artistic growth.

Gayi became the first artist from Uganda to claim the spotlight, highlighting the diversification of winning artists from various African countries and underscoring the competition’s growing impact and the abundant artistic talent across the continent.

JOSEPH BEYANGA

Renowned broadcaster Joseph Beyanga is leading a one-man campaign for safer roads in Uganda. Through his Joe Walker campaign walks to different parts of Uganda, Beyanga continues to raise awareness about the toll road accidents have on communities in Uganda.

GHETTO KIDS

The dance group which comprises young kids from the ghettos of Kampala came out as finalists during the recent Britain’s Got Talent.

Ghetto Kids

The group of globe trotters also featured at the award ceremony of the recently held CAF awards in Morocco. Their meteoric rise has been inspirational.

AGATHER ATUHAIRE

As freelance investigative journalist-cum-lawyer, Agatha Atuhaire won the 2023 European Union (EU) Human Rights Defenders award.

Leveraging her social media presence, especially on Twitter, Atuhaire has become a voice to reckon with. She has proven that citizens will always find ways to hold their leaders to account outside the traditional means of protesting.

NICHOLAS LUBEGA

This gentleman has a golden heart. During a heavy down-pour at Namboole inter-change, several people were close to drowning in a taxi after it failed to navigate the heavy flood waters.

However, Lubega, diving a Hardware World cement-mixer truck, risked his life to save the people by towing them to safety. Such kind-hearted people are very few in Uganda.

HAMIRA KOBUSINGYE

The climate activist was the 18th winner of the Bremen Solidarity Prize for her efforts against climate change and fossil fuels in Uganda. The award is intended to encourage individuals or initiatives working to overcome injustice and the consequences of colonialism and racism, as well as for democracy and human rights.

TONNY TUMUKUNDE

The young lawyer has created a niche as a serial philanthropist. On social media, he leads several funding drives on top of his regular motivational quotes.

DR MARTIN ORIGA

Dr Martin Origa, a medical specialist in the screening and treatment of cervical cancer at the Uganda Cancer Institute, was awarded for designing a strategy for screening cervical cancer using mobile technology.

Dr Martin Origa

He was awarded the Lee Jong-Wook fellowship at Yonsi University, South Korea. The strategy aims at stepping up sensitization campaigns and access to screening services to address the burden in the country.

JAMILAH MAYANJA

The entrepreneur won the 2023 AWA award for innovating water-proof smart bags. The bag aims at keeping girls in rural areas in school.

Made of recyclable plastic, the bag carries reusable sanitary pads, books, charging phones, and lighting the lamps. The bag has a solar panel and a USB port for charging phones.

Jamilah also won the 2023 Leadership Impact Award in the US. The Leadership Impact Award annually recognizes the individual achievements of one outstanding member of the Mandela Washington Fellowship Alumni Network.

ANTHONY NATIF

Shortly after the brazen killing of about 40 students at Mpondwe- Lhubiriha Secondary School in Kasese by suspected Allied Democratic Forces (ADF) rebels, Natif led a group of friends to Kasese to condole with the families of the slain students.

The group of friends offered to support the education of the survivors through school. The education fund served as a much-needed ray of hope in the lives of the survivors.

KAKWENZA RUKIRABASHAIJA

In June, Ugandan novelist Kakwenza Rukirabashaija was announced as the winner of the Václav Havel Prize for Creative Dissent award for authoring ‘Banana Republic and The Greedy Barbarian’ books in which he takes aim at the political ills of the country.

The prize recognizes individuals who engage in creative dissent, exhibiting courage and creativity to challenge injustice and live in truth.

MOREEN AGENA AND EDWARD ECHWALU

The Echwalus recently completed a round trip from Uganda to South Africa dubbed Africa by road. Away from the exciting photos and short notes about their trip, the couple inspired more married people to spend quality time together outside the usual.

The Echwalus

Theirs was an opportunity to tell Uganda’s story across Sub- Saharan Africa by road.

MAMA D

Dorcus Bashema Kirabo, aka Mama D, broke the Guinness World Record for the longest cooking marathon. She broke the record at Zoe’s Cakes & Bites in Kira division.

She started the challenge on December 24, 2023, thus setting a record of 144 hours of continuous cooking. She surpassed the previous record set by Irish chef Alan Fisher at 119 hours, 57 minutes, and 16 seconds.

FRANCIS KIGOZI

Kigozi, a truck driver with modest earnings, has shown remarkable generosity by making a positive impact on several patients’ lives at St. Mary’s hospital Lacor, located in Gulu City.

Whenever he embarks on a journey from Kampala to Juba in South Sudan, he makes it a point to stop at Lacor hospital to donate items to the patients. His donations include food items and clothes.

Anatoli Kirigwajjo

ANATOLI KIRIGWAJJO

The same year, software engineer Anatoli Kirigwajjo won the Africa Prize for Engineering Innovation Award. He was awarded at an event organized by the Royal Academy of Engineering in Accra, Ghana.

He created Yoga, a digital security network connecting communities within 20km through a smartphone app and SMS, hence providing security at the cheaper cost.

GODWIN TOKO

Toko completes the Atuhaire-Ssentongo trinity of individuals who have redefined the use of social media as a social protest platform about the challenges that Ugandans face. He has been very vocal about the continued disappearances of NUP supporters.

ALEX KAKANDE

On Twitter, Kakande now provides pro bono investment advice to several Ugandans. His tweets offer expert opinions on alternative investment sectors beyond traditional savings schemes.

AMOS WEKESA

Last year, Kasese municipality hosted the second edition of the annual Mountain Rwenzori Marathon, a brainchild of Amos Wekesa and other friends.

Just on their second birthday, A 42-kilometre running route that snakes through the lush green Queen Elizabeth National Park. Away from raising more awareness about the tourism promises of Kasese as a tourism destination, the marathon is a business opportunity for the residents of the town.

{loadposition inarticle}

read more
O

observer.ug

@observer Wed, 03 Jan 2024 02:01:25

Tensions: How Ssenyonyi will deal with Among

On December 22, a significant announcement shook the political landscape in Uganda as Joel Ssenyonyi assumed the role of Leader of the Opposition (LoP) in Parliament, succeeding Mathias Mpuuga.

In an exclusive interview with BAKER BATTE LULE, Ssenyonyi addressed various aspects of his new leadership role and the dynamics surrounding it. Ssenyonyi acknowledged that his previous interactions with the speaker of Parliament, Annet Anita Among, had been marked by tension, with the speaker once openly characterizing him as lazy.

However, Ssenyonyi expressed his readiness for a fresh beginning in this new capacity. He conveyed optimism that Speaker Among would extend her support in his new role, signaling a shift from the adversarial relationship that had characterized their interactions during his tenure as the head of the Committee on Commissions, Statutory Authorities, and State Enterprises (COSASE).

This development carries significant implications for the political landscape in Uganda, as Ssenyonyi takes on the crucial role of Leader of the Opposition in Parliament. His ability to navigate and collaborate within the parliamentary framework, particularly with the speaker, will be closely watched by political observers and stakeholders alike.

The hope is that this new chapter in Ssenyonyi’s political career will usher in a more cooperative and constructive approach in the nation’s legislative process. Read the excerpts:

What was your reaction when you were informed that you would be assuming the role of the new Leader of the Opposition?

It was a mixed bag of emotions for me – a tinge of excitement, but also a dose of contemplation as I considered the challenges that lay ahead. My mind was filled with thoughts.

While the realization that I would be the next Leader of the Opposition (LoP) brought excitement, it was tempered by the awareness of the substantial work that lay ahead. As I reflected on the responsibilities ahead of me, the initial excitement waned, but it was replaced with a sense of humility. It’s truly humbling that my colleagues in leadership deemed me deserving of this role.

I understand that you hold positions in all the decision-making bodies of your party. Can you explain how you reached the conclusion that Joel was the most suitable candidate for this role?

Several names were considered during this deliberation process, and it’s worth noting that, due to my involvement, I was rightfully excluded from certain meetings.

This exclusion aligns with the principles of impartiality and fairness. However, the ultimate decision-making authority lies with the National Executive Committee (NEC). Prior to reaching this final stage, extensive consultations took place, culminating in the NEC’s decision. This summarizes the overall process.

It appears that the process leading up to your announcement as the Leader of the Opposition (LoP) did not proceed as smoothly as anticipated. The meeting that preceded your announcement took longer than expected. What were the points of contention that led to this extended deliberation?

To begin with, it’s important to clarify that
the meeting you mentioned was just one in a series of numerous lengthy meetings that had taken place over the past few weeks. The reason why this particular meeting extended beyond the expected timeframe was primarily due to the anticipation surrounding the announcement of the next Leader of the Opposition (LoP).

However, it’s essential to note that this meeting was not solely focused on the LoP position. Several other key roles, including the Chief Whip and the composition of the entire shadow cabinet, were also on the agenda. Considering the multitude of positions and the necessary considerations and discussions, it is not surprising that the meeting took longer than anticipated.

You mentioned the National Executive Committee (NEC), but I observed that following the NEC meeting, the secretary general presented a pre-printed list. It appears as though the top party executives had already predetermined their decisions. Can you clarify the purpose of convening the NEC if the decisions had already been made beforehand?

In fact, that’s not accurate. The list that the secretary general had, included the names of the existing leadership, and the new appointments were added in ink.

This is why the media did not receive a copy immediately; they had to visit the office to type it out. So, the list you saw initially represented the current leadership, from the Leader of the Opposition to all other leaders, and everything during the NEC meeting was indeed written in ink.

Therefore, the assertion of pre-determined positions is not accurate. It’s important to note that even the NEC members were consulted in this process, emphasizing that it was a thorough and inclusive decision-making process.

What is the leadership of Ssenyonyi bringing on the table?

First and foremost, I would like to extend my heartfelt appreciation to the Right Honourable Mathias Mpuuga for his outstanding leadership and dedicated service during some incredibly challenging times. Following the 2021 elections, with our party taking the helm of the opposition, we faced a myriad of complex challenges.

Tragically, lives were lost, individuals were incarcerated, and some even went missing. The circumstances were extraordinarily difficult, to say the least. In the face of these formidable challenges, Mathias Mpuuga exhibited unwavering resolve and steered us through turbulent waters. The expectations placed upon our leadership were exceedingly high, but he remained resolute and provided guidance. I wholeheartedly salute him for his remarkable leadership.

Importantly, it’s worth noting that he continues to be an integral part of our leadership team, and I firmly believe there is much wisdom to glean from him and those who served in leadership roles before him. This is where I intend to begin, by forging connections with my fellow leaders and seeking their insights on various matters.

While I do bring my own ideas and perspective as a leader, I recognize the importance of collaborative decision-making. When we come together, I will share my thoughts and engage in discussions with my colleagues. This leadership journey is not a solitary endeavor; it thrives when we collectively contribute our insights, and it ensures that the burdens of leadership are not carried by one individual alone.

You say you intend to consult with Mpuuga, but it’s essential to note that he was replaced due to the party’s dissatisfaction with his methods. Why do you believe consulting with someone whose approach was not appreciated by the party is a wise course of action?

“Rejected”, what do you mean? Because if he were rejected, he wouldn’t be a commissioner, which is not a small position. The commission holds a prominent position within parliament, with the speaker chairing this important body.

Of course, you cannot equate being a commissioner to LoP.

Without a doubt. So, does that imply that he was demoted for not doing a good job? Indeed, people are entitled to their opinions, and I began by acknowledging and saluting Mathias Mpuuga for his leadership and his contributions. None of us are without imperfections, and it’s important to recognize that Ssenyonyi, as his successor, will not perform miracles on his own.

That’s precisely why I emphasize the importance of teamwork and collaboration. Even when one may not be perfect, there are significant contributions that individuals can make. Mathias Mpuuga has demonstrated his ability to make meaningful contributions, which is why the leadership still values his role, even though he has been assigned to a different position. It’s essential for us to adapt to the concept of change.

In Uganda, where President Museveni has held office for nearly 40 years, many citizens have never known any other leader, making the idea of change a significant adjustment. Our belief, as the National Unity Platform, is in empowering new leaders after a term of two and a half years.

This doesn’t imply that Mathias Mpuuga was replaced due to incompetence; if that were the case, he wouldn’t have been considered for another prominent position. Change is a fundamental part of our political philosophy, aimed at ensuring that leadership is refreshed and new voices are heard.

Speaking of offering him another position, it’s worth noting that it’s unprecedented for someone to be demoted from the number one position and then subsequently selected as number three. In the past 20 years of the opposition, when someone was dropped, they typically remained out of the leadership. What was the intention behind this unusual decision?

There is no set template for these things. I recall being in the media when Professor Ogenga Latigo became the Leader of Opposition (LoP); it was a first at the time after we transitioned into multiparty politics. He served his term, and there have been several other leaders since then.

Was he a bad leader? No. Was he perfect? No, but he led effectively. Following him, we saw leaders like the Honorable Nandala Mafabi, Winnie Kiiza, and others. Therefore, we should become accustomed to the idea that leadership can and does change.

However, appointing him as a commissioner raises questions about the rationale behind this decision. Unlike the others you’ve mentioned, none of them were dropped from their positions and then placed in another role. What was the strategic calculation behind this move?

Firstly, there was no calculated strategy behind this decision. Secondly, there was no intention to placate anyone because placating implies trying to calm a turbulent situation, which did not exist in this context.

Mathias Mpuuga could have chosen to become a backbench member of parliament, a path taken by previous LoPs. However, as the National Unity Platform (NUP), we believe that his leadership still holds value, and we can benefit from it in a different capacity. This reflects our belief in the continued service he can provide to the party. Importantly, Mathias Mpuuga has accepted the party’s nomination for the role of commissioner, which underscores the significance of this decision.

He has not expressed discontent or questioned the rationale behind the change, demonstrating an appreciation for the value of change and its positive impact.

What do you intend to do?

I will start by highlighting the importance of the law, specifically the Administration of the Parliament Act and our Rules of Procedure. These documents outline the roles of the Leader of the Opposition (LoP), with a particular emphasis on the critical task of holding the government accountable.

This accountability takes various forms. Firstly, Uganda has grappled with a persistent issue for many years – the misallocation of budgeted funds. Money allocated for specific projects often seems to vanish into thin air. It is our duty to ensure that the government is held accountable for taxpayers’ money.

We must demand transparency and oversight to prevent these funds from being misappropriated. Secondly, our country faces a substantial challenge regarding poor service delivery. Taxpayers do not often see commensurate value for their money. Therefore, it is our responsibility to scrutinize government actions and demand better service delivery when public funds are allocated for specific projects.

We cannot accept a situation where the public’s hard-earned money fails to translate into quality services. Furthermore, we cannot condone a scenario where individuals are subjected to harm or imprisonment simply based on their political beliefs. This is unacceptable, and we must vocally oppose such injustices.

When we adjourned, the issue of missing persons and human rights violations was a pressing concern in parliament. We concluded that there must be a comprehensive inquiry into these matters. While not everyone may share this perspective, I aim to rally my colleagues to address these issues effectively.

It’s crucial to recognize that within the opposition, we have diverse parties, including NUP, FDC, UPC, JEEMA, DP, PPP, and others. As a leader, it’s essential to acknowledge and collaborate with all these groups. We are more alike than different, and working together can lead to more impactful outcomes.

You are entering a parliament led by a speaker with whom your relationship over the past two years has been marked by clashes, and some of your CASASE reports were not adopted. What sort of relationship can we expect to see you establish with the speaker now that you are in a position that necessitates at least a functional working relationship?

I don’t necessarily need to establish a friendship with the speaker. We both hold leadership positions and operate within our respective roles. There should be common ground where we can find agreement and areas where our disagreements are made clear. Being friends is not a prerequisite.

In the National Unity Platform (NUP), I am a leader, and while I may have friendships with some fellow leaders, it’s not a universal requirement. Similarly, in parliament, the colleagues I work with don’t all have to be my friends, including the speaker. My focus is on fulfilling my responsibilities.

The bare minimum, and I’ve expressed this to the speaker before, is that as speaker, she represents all of us. Even though she belongs to the NRM, when holding the position of speaker, neutrality is expected, as she is a leader for all of us. This means providing equal space, and not letting political differences lead to conflicts.

An illustrative example is the issue of missing persons. Parliament passed a resolution, and during that time, it was the deputy speaker presiding. The resolution required the government to respond within thirty days, but the deadline passed without a response. The speaker was angered with those of us demanding a response, but we made it clear that our issue wasn’t with her but with the government.

We emphasized that she shouldn’t bear the responsibility for their failure to respect the parliamentary resolution. I will continue to emphasize the importance of the speaker remaining neutral and allowing those responsible for their actions to bear the consequences.

Where agreement is possible, we will find it; where there are disagreements, I will clearly express my position. Even in committees, I believe in respecting the right of minority opinions, and it’s essential for everyone to understand that differing views are part of the democratic process. During my tenure as the chairperson of COSASE, we didn’t have a single minority report, but I acknowledge that committees have the right to express dissenting opinions, and I will respect that right, moving forward. Nobody should take offence at my approach; it’s all part of our parliamentary democracy.

For those of us observing from the outside, we have witnessed an adversarial relationship between you and the speaker. Are we now witnessing a change in tone, or should we expect a continuation of the same dynamic?

I made my position very clear during a particular instance when the Uganda Airlines report was prepared, and I requested that it be included on the order paper. However, the speaker indicated that it had leaked, to which I responded by suggesting that efforts be made to identify the source of the leak.

There is no rule that dictates a report should not be presented if it has been leaked, as doing so would undermine the authority of our committees. This was one point of contention. Additionally, we disagreed when the speaker issued a directive that certain entities should be discussed in camera (privately).

I questioned this decision and sought clarification, as I believed that, as a leader of the committee, I deserved to know the reasoning behind it. I expressed concern that such a move could lead to misunderstandings since we had been conducting investigations openly for other cases.

While I acknowledged that some discussions could indeed occur privately, provided there was a valid reason, I questioned the lack of sufficient justification in this particular instance. This disagreement led to tension, and the speaker seemed to become annoyed. However, I later communicated to her that if she had concerns, it would have been more constructive for her to approach me directly to discuss them rather than resorting to public statements.

I emphasized that I would have been willing to explain the rationale behind my actions. It’s important to note that I do not view the parliamentary environment as one where orders are given and blindly followed, akin to the military. Instead, I believe in open and constructive dialogue.

I intend to convey to the speaker that if she has any concerns, it would be more productive to engage in a discussion to better understand each other’s perspectives, rather than escalating conflicts publicly.

What kind of leader should she expect?

First and foremost, I see myself as a leader who will execute my mandate in accordance with the law. I genuinely hope to receive support from the speaker in fulfilling my role of holding the government accountable. It’s important to emphasize that this responsibility is not mine alone; I am carrying it out on behalf of parliament and the people of Uganda.

Furthermore, I’m optimistic that I can find allies even among members of the NRM, as the quality of service delivery affects all of us and transcends political boundaries. There is a divergence in the approaches that leadership should take.

Mathias Mpuuga was well-liked, even by some within the government, as he was regarded as a gentleman. On the other hand, you lead a group of young individuals who advocate for a more assertive parliament. What can we anticipate in terms of your approach, considering these two differing styles?

In my approach, I have a range of tools in my toolbox, and as a leader, it’s crucial to discern which tool is most suitable for the task at hand. There will be situations where I can collaborate with colleagues across the aisle, advocating for budget allocations that prioritize essential areas like healthcare.

In contrast, I might question seemingly questionable budget items, such as significant sums allocated for behavior change, which can often be a cover for misappropriation of funds. In these instances, engaging with colleagues to align on the right course of action is essential.
However, there will also be moments where I firmly stand my ground and articulate my position clearly. It’s a matter of assessing when to apply which approach.

I do have some friends within the NRM, and a few have reached out to congratulate me, expressing their belief in my ability and wishing me success. While the extent of their support may vary, it provides a starting point for potential allies in holding the government accountable.

When examining your cabinet, the first question that comes to mind is, what are your impressions of the individuals you have been assigned to work with?

The opposition in parliament includes more than just NUP; so, it’s essential to unite everyone and function as a cohesive team. It’s noteworthy that our cabinet lineup is diverse, with proper representation from the opposition. Importantly, this list isn’t solely based on affirmative action; the individuals on the lineup are highly competent, and I have confidence that we will collaborate effectively to fulfill our mandate.

You are the youngest Leader of the Opposition (LoP) at 37 years of age, and some individuals have reservations based on your age and experience, questioning whether you are suited for the responsibilities of the role you have been assigned.

Firstly, the expectations are indeed high, which presents a challenge for leadership. When people’s expectations are elevated, it means we have to bring our best to the table. Some have commented on my youth and lack of experience, but it’s important to note that experience isn’t something you can purchase in a store.

Even those who are considered experienced were given opportunities. For instance, when individuals like General Mugisha Muntu emerged from the bush, he became an army commander at a young age of around 30. Dr Kizza Besigye served as a minister at just 30. Similarly, when Robert Kyagulanyi [NUP president] declared his candidacy for the presidency, he was the same age as I am now.

Some initially dismissed him, but he has gone on to lead effectively. When I was appointed as the chairperson of COSASE, there were doubts about my suitability for the role, given my relatively short time in politics. However, along the way, some of those same skeptics were expressing appreciation for the work accomplished by the team I led.

It’s natural for people to have doubts and reservations; that’s part of human nature. Doubting Thomases exist, but with time, they will come to recognize who I am and what I can achieve. I’m eager to collaborate effectively with the team I’ll lead on the opposition side.

Additionally, I hope to build alliances across the aisle because issues related to service delivery transcend political affiliations. My aspiration
is for collective efforts in addressing these matters, and I’m looking for Ugandans from all walks of life to join us in this endeavor. Above all, I’m a believer, and I have faith that God will guide and assist me in executing my mandate effectively.

bakerbatte@gmail.com

{loadposition inarticle]

read more
O

observer.ug

@observer Tue, 02 Jan 2024 14:26:36

At least 48 dead from Japan earthquake

At least 48 people have been confirmed dead from the powerful New Year’s Day earthquake that struck off the western coast of Japan.

Much of the damage from the quake, which the Japan Meteorological Agency said was a magnitude 7.6, occurred in Ishikawa prefecture on the island of Honshu. Dozens of homes and buildings were flattened, with an unknown number of people trapped in the rubble. Roads have been split in pieces, and a runway in at least one regional airport had cracked, making it difficult for emergency officials to assess the damage.

The earthquake triggered tsunami waves measuring more than one meter that swept across the region, washing cars and homes into the sea and scuttling scores of fishing boats. The brunt of the damage in Ishikawa occurred in the port city of Wajima, famous for its morning market and fine lacquerware and other traditional crafts. The quake triggered a massive fire that destroyed numerous buildings.

Firefighters battled throughout Monday night to bring the fire under control. Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida said Tuesday during a meeting with government disaster officials that search and rescue crews are waging “a battle against time” to save any victims who remain trapped in the rubble in Ishikawa prefecture.

About 1,000 members of the Japanese Self-Defense Forces have been dispatched to the disaster zones. More than 40,0000 households in Ishikawa remain without electricity.

The Japanese Meteorological Agency lifted all tsunami warnings for the western region by early Tuesday morning. The agency initially issued a major tsunami warning for Ishikawa and lower-level tsunami warnings or advisories for the rest of the western coast of Honshu, as well as the northernmost of its main islands, Hokkaido.

Monday’s quake has been followed by several strong aftershocks, which the agency says could continue over the next few days. The quake revived memories of the March 2011 earthquake and subsequent tsunami that knocked out the power supply and cooling systems at a nuclear plant in northeastern Fukushima prefecture.

The damage led to a meltdown of its three reactors, leading to the world’s worst nuclear disaster since the 1986 Chernobyl accident. But a government spokesperson said there were no reported irregularities at any of the nuclear power plants near the epicenter of Monday’s quake.

Authorities closed some major highways near the epicenter, and bullet train services between Tokyo and Ishikawa were suspended for hours, although some service in the earthquake region was restored Monday evening.

{loadposition inarticle}

read more
O

observer.ug

@observer Tue, 02 Jan 2024 11:54:27

L.Victoria boat accident: 5 bodies retrieved, 14 rescued

The five bodies of people who drowned in Lake Victoria in Buvuma district yesterday, January 1 have been retrieved.

The boat, which was reportedly overloaded with a nonspecified number of people broke into two pieces and capsized shortly before docking at Zinga Island in Buvuma.

Bugaya LC III chairperson Jodoro Sserwanja says that most of the people on the boat were returning from the Passover night prayers organized at one of the shrines at Zigunga Island to usher in the New Year.  

So far 14 people have been successfully rescued. These include Annet Bandibasa 35, Florence Nakintu 35, Samali Nassali 3, Olivia Nalunga 6, Joseph Bukenya 50, Joseph Omoding 15, Shinsia Kaguna 9, David Mukasa 54, Kutusa Namatovu 40, Juma Kakungulu 13, Nishima Saluwa 9, Precious Nazziwa 6, Yisa Yoweri 2, and Dan Sseluyembe who is just six months.

The deceased were identified as Monday Bukenya, 50, Sisa Nantaba, 7, Lydia Nanjita, 16, Night Ssabano 9, and Angel Namuwaya 10.

Ssezibwa Regional police spokesperson, Hellen Butoto says an unconfirmed number of individuals remain missing. According to her, accounts from eyewitnesses suggest that the boat was carrying more people than those who have been accounted for.

“Fourteen survivors were helped by their colleagues and those with swimming abilities were able to rescue themselves. These survivors were transported to Bugaya hospital, where they are currently receiving medical attention,” Butoto says.

{loadposition inarticle}

read more